If you really want to know who Doug Ford is, consider what Linda McQuaig has written:
There will be no cheapness on the part of the Ford government when it comes to providing for customers visiting the private spa to be built at Ontario Place.
On the other hand, the Ford government is exhibiting plenty of cheapness when it comes to providing for children getting an education in Ontario. (Those would be our children, by the way).
And so it is that our “populist” premier will spend $400 million building a parking garage for the convenience of well-to-do spa users, while scrimping on the most basic educational materials in Ontario’s schools.
That scrimping — education funding has dropped by $1,200 per student under Ford (in inflation-adjusted dollars) — explains why classroom shelves are empty after teachers remove the learning materials they have provided, and schools increasingly rely on fundraising drives to pay for technology, libraries and classroom supplies, leaving schools in lower-income areas at a disadvantage.
The government’s miserly approach to funding our children’s education seems curious in such a rich province.
It's not that Ontario doesn't have the money:
The government is actually swimming in money — even as it hollows out key public programs, underfunding schools, shutting down hospital emergency wards and doing nothing for the homeless beyond allowing developers to build ever more condos that are quickly sold to high-income buyers.
While underfunding our public programs didn’t start with Doug Ford, his government has raised this sorry practice to a guiding principle.
For years, we have been told by provincial business and political leaders that we must cut government spending to keep deficits under control — or international investors will cut us off.
That threat was always grossly exaggerated. Our deficits were always manageable; there was never the slightest risk international investors would cut us off.
The notion that we cannot afford a strong public sector has always been a scam.
But it’s particularly a scam these days. The Ford government’s own numbers show a sea of surpluses — not deficits — over the next four years.
And the government’s finances are even better than it likes to admit. The province’s Fiscal Accountability Office — an independent government agency — reported last month that Ontario is on track to collect $22 billion more than it plans to spend on its public programs.
That’s $22 billion that is not being used to adequately fund our education, health care and other vital public programs that determine the quality of life for millions of Ontarians.
If you're a rich land developer, Doug Ford's your man. If you're an ordinary citizen of Ontario -- or the child of one of those ordinary citizens -- he'll do nothing for you.
Image: rabble.ca
10 comments:
"A place to stand,
and a place to grow,
and we'll call this land
Doug Ford's rodeo"
That just about covers it, PoV.
Since Ford's political and economic views have been perfectly clear, why did he get voted in? Are the good citizens of Ontario a bit dim witted?
A good question, hels. We knew who he was and a majority of us voted for him -- twice.
why did he get voted in?
Liberalss had an invisible leader, NDP had one who had hung on too long, and for some mind boggling reason the healthcare and education contingents did not vote en mass to get rid of the PCs.
It's hard to say who's more dangerous, Ford or the asshats that voted for him a second time. When's the last time you bought a beer for a buck? Fools!
Unhappiness was the general order of the day, jrk. Unfortunately, unhappy people don't always think clearly.
We get the government we deserve, zoombats.
Unfortunately, unhappy people don't always think clearly.
Clearly the "leadership" cadre of the Liberals and the NDP were extremely unhappy. Who was the leader of the Ontario Liberals. I could not remember his name (I am pretty sure it was a male) during the election and I certainly don't remember it now.
I could remember Andrea Horvath's name. Now to remember Marit Stiles name befor the next election.
Does the name Howard Hampton ring a bell, jrk?
Post a Comment