We live in a time of multiple crises -- the dangers from climate change, economic inequality and revived racism are real. But E. J. Dionne argues that the most pressing question we face is: "Can liberal democracy survive?"
I’d argue that the challenge to liberal democracy is far and away the most consequential question facing the world. If liberal democracy does not survive and thrive, every other problem we face becomes much more difficult.
Liberal democracy is, in principle, a simple if also profound idea: a belief in governments created through free elections and universal suffrage; an independent judiciary; and guarantees of the freedoms of speech, assembly, religion and press. Some of my more libertarian-leaning friends — and in our shared desire to defend liberal democracy, we are friends — would define it as excluding various forms of regulation and redistribution.
The trend towards libertarianism is partly responsible for the problems we face:
I’d agree with them that the right to private property is a characteristic of liberal societies but insist that there is also an important place for social insurance, government provision of various services (education and health care among them) and rules protecting workers, consumers and the environment. Indeed, the vast inequalities that capitalism can produce when unchecked typically undermine liberal democracy and are doing so now.
And authoritarianism is on the rise:
History is starting to scowl as once-solid democracies (Hungary, Poland and Turkey, along with many outside Europe) move in an autocratic direction. China, meanwhile, offers a path to development and growth that involves neither freedom nor democracy.
Even where liberal democracy has its strongest foundations, authoritarian brands of populism have gained ground by exploiting widespread discontent.
This is, indeed, our summer of discontent. The choices that spring from that discontent will make all the difference.
Image: Daily Mail
8 comments:
If the thinks Poland and Hungary were once solid democracies then he has different definitions of solid and democracy than do I.
The reason for failure of liberal democracy is that is it can fix the transgender problem
but not address the single pothole restoration costing 1000 dollars. We have governments of silly walks. I am 58 years old and the biggest thing I have noticed is a general lack of competency or commitment from everyone. Starting at the top the citizens have noticed
and those not 1% have decided, I dont give a fuck.
Good point, Dana. What began with hope -- Solidarity -- has gone sour.
I agree we have a crisis of competence, Steve. What is amazing is that Trump was clearly incompetent from the day he threw his hat in the ring. Yet he was elected. Voters have a lot to do with the incompetence they get.
I'm with Dana. Hungary, Poland and Turkey have had a brief and troubled introduction to democracy. These comparisons inevitably overlook our own tortured road to liberal democracy that dates back to Magna Carta signed at Runnymede in June, 1215. How long did it take us to get from there to universal suffrage? About 800 years and there were many setbacks along the way, rights given then lost or withdrawn that had to be reclaimed, a price sometimes paid in blood. Despite our own well-documented 800-year history we deign to judge others' progress over just a few decades.
Democracy is a living thing, like a plant. You have to prepare the soil for planting. Then you have to nurture the seedling with fertilizers and removal of weeds and pests. Even once it takes hold and grows, it will still die if you don't tend and water it. In so many ways we have today ceased to tend to our democracy. We have taken it for granted. We no longer see the many perils that endanger it and we don't intervene in the defence of our democracy.
Benjamin Franklin warned his countrymen that their government would survive "if you can keep it," Mound. We have not been working very hard to keep it.
Owen, GWB and Rick Perry two very successful politicians that could not screw in a light-bulb
in a team effort. Starting with Reagan the goal posts move from being Presidential to being electable, and Trump he carpetbagged that.
It's always been about getting elected, Steve. What's changed are the methods -- and the technology -- which make winning possible.
Post a Comment