It has been instructive to watch the flip-flops Ontario's Conservatives have done on the subject of the sex-ed curriculum. Martin Regg Cohen writes:
Behold the politics of pedagogy, where the Tories play footsie with fundamentalists who believe there is a biblical injunction against teaching children age-appropriate sex-ed updated for the modern age:
In 2010, the Tories under Tim Hudak railed against the revisions. By 2014, the PCs reconciled themselves to an update under interim leader Jim Wilson (ejected last year from caucus in a sex scandal). In 2015, Patrick Brown’s PCs rallied with social conservatives against the curriculum, but later renounced so-cons and backed the update (until Brown was rejected by caucus amid allegations of sexual impropriety).
When Ford took over as leader last year, backed by those same so-cons, the Tories repudiated the curriculum once again. Today, a PC government has grudgingly recognized that in the internet era there is no turning back the clock — not when children know more than their parents about the digital world we (they) live in.
In this political byplay, the Tories are masking their about-face by loudly proclaiming a parental right to opt out of sex-ed for their children (though Lord knows children will ultimately litigate against anyone barring them from the right to know about such matters, as they successfully have in other court jurisdictions).
What is most peculiar about this disingenuous PC boast is that such an opt-out was offered by the allegedly godless Wynne Liberals all along, in a vain attempt to satisfy fundamentalists (religious and social) who claimed to know not only what was right for their own children, but what was best for all of us — by depriving all children (theirs and mine) of an updated curriculum. The latest opt-out is not only nothing new, but it was a compromise on offer all along.
Consider, too, the Fordian position on the "carbon tax" -- which Ford railed against last week -- but which Enviroment Minister Catherine McKenna pointed out is exactly that -- a carbon tax.
Which leads to this question: Is the Ontario Conservative Party guided by any principles? If so, what are they?
Image: Shutterstock
6 comments:
The sex ed opt-out "change" is the same as the "new" cell phone ban wherein teachers have the power to tell kids to put them away like we've been doing since they've been invented. Cons are just being blown around by the wind, unless the group they're harming is too small to put up enough of a fight, like kids on the autism spectrum. They're bullies when they think they can win.
The OPCs run on the same principles as the GOP: make the rich richer and do the opposite of whatever liberals want.
Cap
They're bullies who are led by a bully, Marie.
That's a concise summary of who they are, Cap.
Libertarians have no principles. It’s easier to understand why they do what they do once we accept that. Harper’s Civitas speech laid out the strategy that we’re seeing at work here once again. Ford doesn’t have the moxie to perform the balancing act that he did, but a lot of his followers will stay the course because they think they’re on a team. Others yet will stay because they identify with his stupidity. Meanwhile the theocons will still have their familiar foreheads, just a little flatter than the last time.
All in all, John, it adds up to a sad state of affairs.
Post a Comment