That's the question Andrew Coyne asks in his most recent column, which comes on the heels of Andrew Scheer's statements on events in New Zealand:
Responding to the horrific massacre of Muslims at prayer in New Zealand, the Conservative leader issued a statement Friday afternoon expressing his “profound condemnation of this cowardly and hateful attack on the Muslim community” along with “the type of extreme and vile hatred that motivated this despicable act of evil.” He added: “To the Muslim community around the world and here at home in Canada, we stand with you.”
It was spot on: straightforward, fitting and right. It was also about 15 hours too late, coming as it did only after Scheer had come under intense criticism for the inadequacy of his first response, which spoke vaguely of an attack on “freedom” and unspecified “worshippers.” The appositeness of the second only highlighted the strange, withholding coldness of the first.
Scheer either over reacts -- his call for Justin Trudeau's resignation -- or under reacts -- his first statement on the massacre in Christchurch. And, rather than being an exception, this inability to get his statements right is now a pattern:
The suspicion that this was no accident is not unreasonable, given Scheer’s past statements and actions. Perhaps he truly did not hear the questioner at a recent town hall who invoked “pizzagate,” the lunatic conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton was connected to a child sex ring supposedly operating out of a Washington, D.C., pizzeria.
But nothing required him to speak at last month’s “United We Roll” rally on Parliament Hill, whose stated purpose — to protest federal environmental policies on behalf of unemployed workers in the oil industry — may have been legitimate, but which had clearly been infiltrated by anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant elements. At the very least, he might have taken the opportunity of his appearance to denounce these views. He did not.
Scheer is like the kid who's always in the wrong place at the wrong time:
Just as disturbing was Scheer’s recent endorsement of conspiracy-minded interpretations of a United Nations document called the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, an unenforceable statement of good intentions with regard to the handling of immigrants and refugees to which most of the world’s nations agreed last year.
This, on top of his party’s unceasing alarmism on the subject of the asylum seekers entering Canada illegally via our southern border — a legitimate issue, to be sure, and one on which the government may deserve criticism, but nothing like the existential “crisis” of so much Conservative rhetoric.
He wasn't ready for prime time when he won the leadership of the Conservative Party. And he's still not ready.
Image: The National Post
4 comments:
Even Scheer's revised comment was not "spot on." Contrary to the advice he received from Harper's former comms director Andrew MacDougall, Scheer fails to condemn the specific pathology that drove the killer.
Compare Scheer's statement to that of Australian PM Scott Morrison, who described the killer as an "extremist, right-wing" terrorist. Like Trump, Scheer cannot bring himself to condemn white right-wing terrorism. That Coyne chooses to ignore this huge moral failure speaks volumes about the corporate media's role in enabling the rise of right-wing extremism.
Cap
Conservative politicians -- generally -- know who pays their bills, Cap. And they won't bite the hand that feeds them.
.. this is all about political posturing, the fresh skin of camoflaging shallow self serving motivation. The fawning & faux holier than thou christianity and lip service on behalf of the 'ultra wealthy' divine right billionaires. Yes, by the underling political animal 'wannabe wealthy' millionaires and sold out captured media who titillate, groom & stroke the 'never will be wealthy' desolate & angry, ignorant base.
Wealth calls the tune, sal. And our politicians have learned how to dance to their music.
Post a Comment