Monday, April 06, 2020

Politics At Its Core


We like to think that, in times such as these, we suspend politics and move to another planet. But David Runciman writes that, in times like these, we get to see how politics really work:

In a democracy we tend to think of politics as a contest between different parties for our support. We focus on the who and the what of political life: who is after our votes, what they are offering us, who stands to benefit. We see elections as the way to settle these arguments. But the bigger questions in any democracy are always about the how: how will governments exercise the extraordinary powers we give them? And how will we respond when they do?
These are the questions that have always preoccupied political theorists. But now they are not so theoretical. As the current crisis shows, the primary fact that underpins political existence is that some people get to tell others what to do. At the heart of all modern politics is a trade-off between personal liberty and collective choice. This is the Faustian bargain identified by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes in the middle of the 17th century, when the country was being torn apart by a real civil war.

Hobbes' world was very dark. Life in his world was nasty, brutish and short. But Hobbes understood the true nature of power. Democracies tend to dress up brute force in a lot of platitudes:

The government is doing all it can to dress up its decisions in the language of commonsense advice. It says it is still trusting individuals to show sound judgment. But as the experience of other European countries shows, as the crisis deepens the stark realities become clearer. Just watch the footage of Italian mayors screaming at their constituents to stay at home. “Vote for me or the other lot get in” is routine democratic politics. “Do this or else” is raw democratic politics. At that point it doesn’t look so different from politics of any other kind.

But we are now being reminded of some hard truths:

National governments really matter, and it really matters which one you happen to find yourself under. Though the pandemic is a global phenomenon, and is being experienced similarly in many different places, the impact of the disease is greatly shaped by decisions taken by individual governments. Different views about when to act and how far to go still mean that no two nations are having the same experience. At the end of it all we may get to see who was right and what was wrong. But for now, we are at the mercy of our national leaders. That is something else Hobbes warned about: there is no avoiding the element of arbitrariness at the heart of all politics. It is the arbitrariness of individual political judgment.

In the end, the individual political judgment of our leaders can make the difference between life and death.

Image: You Tube


6 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's not just governments that have power...corporations also have too much power. I entered into a two year contract for cable and internet and that contract protected the service provider but did not give me any protection...not even against price increases. I only did it because they offered me a $150 visa card. Try complaining about something to airline personnel and see how fast you are removed from the plane.

GDN

Owen Gray said...

Point well taken, GDN. The law of the jungle has become the conventional wisdom in many aspects of modern life.

John B. said...

No matter what law we're concerned with, the powerful will always own it. They face no consequences for bad behaviour and don't believes that they should. In response to efforts to redress the shortcomings that led to the 07/08 crash Jamie Dimon has clearly said as much as that. Politicians in the Us would seem to have agreed.

Owen Gray said...

That's what gaining power is all about these days, John. Power puts you above the law.

jrkrideau said...

ust watch the footage of Italian mayors screaming at their constituents to stay at home. “Vote for me or the other lot get in” is routine democratic politics. “

I must have seen a different video. What I saw was mayors pleading/threatening/demanding that these citizen self-isolate for the good of all citizens.

I did enjoy the one mayor who threatened te break up illegal parties by sending the police with flamethrowers.

Perhaps Runciman should have picked a better example?

Owen Gray said...

Moments like this one offer glaring examples of good leaders and bad leaders, jrk.