Saturday, January 14, 2023

The Just Transition Act

There is a huge battle brewing in the West. Gary Mason writes:

In the 2019 federal election, Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party announced that if elected, the government would introduce the “Just Transition Act,” which would give workers and communities dependent on the oil and gas industry the training and support they need to thrive in the clean, green economy of the future.

The announcement garnered little attention at the time. And after the Liberals won re-election, it was basically forgotten.

But now the federal government intends to keep its promise and things could get ugly:

Alberta holds the biggest megaphone on this file, and Premier Danielle Smith is using it to warn of war with Ottawa if it introduces a law that she suspects will threaten the livelihoods of those making a very good income in the province’s oil patch.

This really could be a redux of the grand fight we witnessed in the early 1980s over the National Energy Program – a battle that Ottawa, and specifically Justin Trudeau’s father, Pierre, lost badly. But Alberta has never forgotten what the feds tried to do: effectively take control over their oil industry. Consequently, anything that smells even remotely like the NEP sets off alarm bells in Wildrose country.

It is Albertans’ liquid gold that has been used to build unfathomable wealth for both individuals and for governments over the decades. But things have changed over the years – namely the menacing presence of climate change, which is not something people in Alberta like to talk about, despite what they will tell you.

Mr. Trudeau recently had the gall to make this point in an interview with Reuters. “One of the challenges is there is a political class in Alberta that has decided that anything to do with climate change is going to be bad for them or for Alberta,” he said, calling for Ms. Smith’s government to use its budget surplus to fund carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technology.

It seems that Mr. Trudeau forgot that Alberta was an early pioneer in CCUS, even if for years the sequestration technology was an expensive disappointment. There is more optimism about it now, but there is still a long way to go before it makes a meaningful reduction in the province’s emission levels.

But there is a larger point:

Still, carbon capture aside, it’s fair to say that Alberta has not exactly been at the forefront of climate policy. The only Alberta premier who has come close to embracing the challenge that climate change poses is the NDP’s Rachel Notley, but she was dumped from office largely on the basis of the carbon tax she introduced. Her successor, Jason Kenney, eliminated the tax as his first order of business upon taking office. He then fought the national carbon tax in court, and lost.

The fact is that Alberta is, by far, Canada’s most polluting province. Emissions there have increased 55 per cent compared with 1990 levels; they have grown by 19 per cent since 2005. Yes, we understand that the province’s main industry is emissions-intensive, but we also shouldn’t pretend that the threat climate change poses is a challenge that has been openly taken up by the whole of Alberta’s political class in recent years, outside of Ms. Notley’s administration.

This is a clash where the divisions run deep. And it won't be easy bridging them.

Image: NASA Climate Change


8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Do we torch our planet or pretend global heating isn't happening and increase oil production? Opinions differ, say the corporate media. We report, you decide.

Stories like this are journalism malpractice. First, the NEP happened a generation ago and is totally irrelevant to the problem of climate change.

Second, carbon capture is a red herring. It implies that it's possible to continue producing oil and meet climate targets. But it's not. Carbon capture only reduces carbon emissions at production, not when the fuel is ultimately burned. And nobody has figured out a way to scale the technology. It's just a way for governments to continue subsidizing an industry that needs to die.

Finally, assuming good faith on the part of Alberta's UCP is something for which there is no evidence at all. The UCP is Big Oil's political wing - they don't give a damn about anything else. It's time for the media to ask them hard questions, like what's your plan to meet Canada's climate targets?

Cap

Owen Gray said...

It's clear that there's no place for fossil fuels in Canada's future, Cap. But getting to that basic truth will not be easy.

zoombats said...

"This is a clash where the divisions run deep. And it won't be easy bridging them".

It won't be a problem when we're all dead.

Owen Gray said...

But it will be until we get there, zoombats.

Northern PoV said...

" a political class in Alberta that has decided that anything to do with climate change is going to be bad for them or for Alberta,”

true ... but in terms of real action that might prevent or at least mitigate the pending deluge, it actually applies the virtually all of the 'pollical class, the world over.

Point to any country that is on track to net-zero.

In Canada, Notley and Trudeau have been more effective executing on expanding FF (subsidies, TMX, CGL etc) because of their effective green washing abilities.

Owen Gray said...

We are a long way away from Net Zero, PoV.

Trailblazer said...

Still, carbon capture aside, it’s fair to say that Alberta has not exactly been at the forefront of climate policy.

Carbon capture will be the biggest scam that the petrochemical industry has unloaded upon us.
The greenwashing for profit industry knows no bounds.

To succeed in our wish to reduce carbon emissions we need to reduce OUR emissions not THE emissions which gives us way to place the onus on others!

Until we elect those that would direct us and encourage us in such a way we will be having the same conversation for many more years.

Owen Gray said...

Point well taken, TB. It's the downstream emissions that we really must control.