Joe Biden has talked a lot about unity. But, E.J. Dionne writes, unity is being overtaken by urgency:
Senate Democrats won their 49th and 50th seats in Georgia’s two runoff elections earlier this month, which gave them the majority thanks to Vice President Harris’s tie-breaking vote. This meant that the Senate had to be reorganized to recognize the shift in control. The outlines of an organizing resolution were already there from the last time the Senate was split 50-50, in 2001.
That didn’t stop Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) from balking. He demanded that Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) promise that Senate Democrats wouldn’t challenge the filibuster rule for the next two years. The current filibuster rule means that most bills need 60 votes to pass. Essentially, McConnell was telling Democrats to give up any power they might have to force action if the GOP persistently blocked Biden’s initiatives.
It is a recipe for unrestrained minority rule.
The Republican Party has been fiercely dedicated to minority rule for decades. That's what their gerrymandering and voter suppression has been all about. It's clear they propose to operate as they have in the past. That presents the Democrats with a problem:
So, as Biden would say, here’s the deal: He and his party should indeed make every effort to negotiate with Republicans to win what support they can get. Bipartisanship is great when it works, so it’s constructive that Brian Deese, the head of the White House’s National Economic Council, is meeting with moderates and moderate conservatives, including Collins and Romney, to try to find common ground. What Democrats can’t afford, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said in an interview, is the “long drawn-out process” that characterized the party’s approach during the early Obama years on both economic stimulus and health care.
This means being willing to move quickly to what is known as the reconciliation process, which would allow passage of economic relief on a simple Senate majority.
“We should give Senate Republicans a very short amount of time to signal if they want to be partners in moving the country forward, or if they intend to be obstructionists,” Van Hollen said. “And the early signaling is that they are reverting to their obstructionist mode.”
Reconciliation rules are largely limited to bills involving money. Eventually, Democrats will have to take on the filibuster itself. They might do this piece by piece if obstruction prevails on particular bills, notably democracy reform efforts.
Already, conservatives are preparing to characterize any remotely progressive proposals from Biden as evidence that he is moving “hard left.” Moderate Democrats should not take the bait — and the early signs are that they won’t.
For decades, the Republicans' prime directive has been to make sure that government doesn't work. Biden's future rests on his being able to make government work -- and to do big things.
6 comments:
I think this could do with a little more precision. For decades, the Republicans' prime directive has been to make sure that government doesn't work for anyone who fails to donate gobs of money. Democrats used to be able to count on strong union support, but a combination of offshoring and right-to-work laws has gutted organized labour. As a result, since Clinton Democrats have relied on large corporate donations too, with predictable results for the common people.
Pay-to-play is now the order of the day. While I expect Democrats will fix some of the GOP's damage to government institutions, I doubt we'll see the sort of popular reforms they'll need to avoid losing the Senate or the House in 2022. Biden is cautious by nature and has long been known as the senator for MasterCard. If he dicks around looking for bipartisanship like Obama did, his two-year window to pass bold legislation will be up, and it'll be back to GOP obstruction. As you say, he needs to go big and he needs to move fast.
Cap
A fair point, Cap. The Republicans have made sure that government works for the wealthy -- which means it works for the few -- not the many.
"Transactional democracy" prevailed in the last two centuries of the Roman Empire. You want, you pay. It didn't bring down the empire but historians believe it was a major contributory factor.
The Gilens and Page study out of Princeton in 2014 exposed the capture of the legislative branch by the affluent. Where the public interest clashed with the narrow, private interest, the House and Senate, by something like a 4 to 1 margin, favoured the private interest. America, the authors concluded, had displaced democracy with oligarchy.
Cap is right. The mid-terms are brutal on new governments. Trump lost the House on his mid-terms. Biden can expect to lose the Senate in two years. I don't see Schumer as a hard-charger. He'll probably be a moderate, consensus type. That is the formula for missed opportunities.
As for the Republicans, we know what to expect as they focus on reclaiming the Senate in two years. The impeachment case against Trump is about as open and shut as they come. He promoted an insurrection to derail the government and Constitution. There were some GOP senators who argued that their last hope of reclaiming the Republican Party meant convicting Trump. Then Trump mused about setting up his own party, the Patriot Party, that, even if it could never rise to power, could consign the GOP to minority purgatory for years. It worked. Support for convicting Trump has collapsed. Their lack of spine is terminal and that bodes poorly for America in the decades to come.
When politicians bow to the mob, Mound, the result will be chaos.
# Owen 4:10 pm
When politicians bow to the mob, Mound, the result will be chaos.
True but it makes a change from genuflecting to cheque-carrying plutocrats.
True, jrk. But the result is the same.
Post a Comment