Justin Trudeau is in trouble. Lots of people wonder why he's sticking around. Michael Harris writes that two new books deal with that question:
Whatever the answer may be, two [books] have just been [published] — a full-length book by Stephen Maher, and a slim volume by Paul Wells. Both ultimately paint the picture of a leader who is washed up.
Maher’s book, The Prince: The Turbulent Reign of Justin Trudeau, is already a No. 1 bestseller on Amazon in the Kindle edition. And the Wells 96-page essay, Justin Trudeau on the Ropes: Governing in Troubled Times, has been reviewed as a skilfully written psychological assessment of one of Canada’s longest-serving prime ministers. Neither work will put many smiles on faces in the Prime Minister’s Office.
Wells also portrays the PM as a man who doesn’t deal well with opposition. It’s his way, or the doorway.
“For all his pedigree and physical grace the work of politics has never come easily to him,” Wells writes, adding that “his judgment is often terrible. He has not surrounded himself with great talent; in fact, he has discovered a real gift for chasing talent away.”
Considering what happened to Jody Wilson-Raybould, Jane Philpott and Gerald Butts, Wells has a point.
The Maher book is much bigger and more extensive:
Maher’s book, at 385 pages, is the first full-length biography of Justin Trudeau, the interest it has already sparked is not surprising. Based on 200 interviews, including one with the PM himself, The Prince offers a trove of inside information that one would expect from the talented journalist who was part of the team that broke the robocalls scandal surrounding the 2011 election.
While Maher was writing the book, I visited with him in his home, a converted boathouse on the back harbour of Lunenburg, Nova Scotia.
Over beer, we talked shop about the challenges of taking on a big book about a Canadian prime minister. I had one piece of advice for him about the complex business of getting a book from concept through to publication, a process in which an author is pushed and pulled in many directions: “Stick to your guns.”
I was struck that day by Maher’s sense of fairness in his assessment of the prime minister. He was not interested in writing a “hate Trudeau” book, although by doing so, it would be easy to cash in on the PM’s plummeting popularity.
When Maher began his work on The Prince, he thought the current PM was a more consequential figure than either Jean Chrétien or Stephen Harper, a high-impact leader who changed the country more than his predecessors.
It was the author’s opinion that history would look kindly on Justin Trudeau. Although that impression changed as his research progressed over 18 months, Maher’s book has been received as a fine example of a traditional journalistic deep dive: exhaustively researched, fair and balanced.
Maher's opinion of Trudeau is now more nuanced. There are two Trudeaus -- the Prince and the Entitled Snob:
Which Trudeau is the real one? The earlier version full of hope and hype, and some big-ticket accomplishments; or the Prince, who can’t get over his own sense of entitlement, even as his tired government seems to have lost its way?
Whether we will ever know the answer to that question depends on what the PM decides to do: walk off undefeated into the lucrative sunset of the speaker’s tour and the corporate boardroom, or stand his ground and fight, despite dismal polls and relentless journalistic epitaphs.
Writing in the Globe and Mail, Maher shared a momentous quote on how the PM himself sees his political future. They are fighting words.
“I just see it as such a fundamental choice in what kind of country we are, who we are as Canadians,” Trudeau told Maher. “That, for me, is what I got into politics for: to have big fights like this about who we are as a country and where we’re going.”
Stay tuned.
20 comments:
It is unfortunate, Owen, that in the reductive mentality of so many voters, the choice is between Trudeau and Poilievre, with many opting for change through the later, despite well-placed and well-expressed concerns about what he will do. For whatever reason, the NDP seems to be rarely be part of the calculus.
The irony is, Lorne, that the NDP is largely responsible for Canada's most progressive legislation.
The biggest question seems to be what are the alternatives, whilst I have no major problems with the Libs like Lorne says I wonder why the NDP does not seem to be a more popular choice ....not that the polls do anything but spout biased opinions from a limited circle of folks!
The NDP has always been a policy powerhouse, Rural. But they've had trouble selling the policies.
I have no time for these self-important ghouls, the so called pundits and "serious" journalist who have been feeding on the carcass of a PM who has been doing a fantastic job in the face of relentless personal attacks from hill-billies whose opinions have been let loose by the loss of decorum, good taste and good manners.
Enough said but my opinion of PMJT is put alongside the alternatives, and he comes out heads above all
Just my two cents worth Owen
" I wonder why the NDP does not seem to be a more popular choice"
Brand
Harper and his Reformers were perennials loser until what's-his-name sold-out the Conservative label for 'Thirty pieces of silver'.
In our politics (and many others) brand 'trumps' all.
If you don't believe me just ask Kevin Falcon. ....
"his catastrophic plan to change the party’s name from BC Liberals to BC United."
https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2024/05/28/Falcon-Stumbles-Doomed-Talks-Conservatives/
Unfortunately, that's true, PoV. However, selling policy should not be like selling soap.
I agree, Ben. One always must ask, "Compared to what?"
s I wonder why the NDP does not seem to be a more popular choice ....not that the polls do anything but spout biased opinions from a limited circle of folks!
The NDP are suffering the same fate as the Greens with their political ,over, correctness.
High ideals are not the route to power!!
TB
It's obvious to me that the choice of Lil' PP or JT or Singh for that matter are uninspiring. I always have thought that Canadians were much more socialist than we have shown but I guess I'm wrong Having said that I wonder how the country would align themselves if we had an N.D.P. led by the recently deceased Ed Broadbent or Audrey Maclaughlin. I think the choice would be obvious
Politics is a tough sport, TB. It's becoming a bloodsport.
Broadbent and MacLauglin are from a different time, zoombats. Post-pandemic, these are nasty times.
Trudeau isn't the only national leader who's having trouble dealing with a public still struggling with a hangover from the virus scare. Add that to the bad manners and vitriol that have become common in political discourse. Poilievre is in his glory.
Unfortunately, John, Poilievre mirrors these nasty times.
PP le pire IS the nasty times DF
He was nasty before the times became nasty, DF.
Politics in Canada has become so moribund that it's a hollow, "lesser evil" contest. We accept whatever thin gruel is ladled out by our party of choice. The inevitable outcome is that we're saddled with administrators who shun leadership.
There was a time when Liberal prime ministers doubled as talent scouts for their successors. The strongest example was Lester Pearson who recruited the "three wisemen" from Quebec. A quick read of his biography reveals a leader of vision and accomplishment the like we haven't seen in the 21st century from either main party.
Today's Liberal supporters have sat on their smug arses as the last vestige of progressive thought was purged from their party. That weighed on me when I decided to give up blogging.
Trudeau the Lesser chose to fail. He did that from the outset but the party rank and file, having been singed by their stupid choice of the leader from Harvard, refused to face reality. The result is that, just as Canada (like every nation) faces a bevy of existential threats, we're left with Trudeau the Unwanted and Poilievre the Dark Farce.
Liberal or Conservative, a pox on both their houses.
MoS
We're in a sad state, Mound. I understand why you stopped blogging. But I must confess that I miss reading what you had to say.
It is always a pleasure to read anything written by MoS. Anyong
I agree, Anyong.
Post a Comment