Donald Trump tells a Big Lie. Vladimir Putin tells a Bigger Lie -- which is what all fascists do. Andrew Nikkiforuk writes:
Whenever asked about his historical or philosophical influences Putin cites an obscure Russian fascist by the name of Ivan Ilyin. Born into a noble family in 1883, Ilyin embraced white fascism as a response to Red fascism, also known as Bolshevism. Ilyin openly admired both Mussolini and Hitler and dreamed of a fascist Europe. Not surprisingly he remained a forgotten Russian émigré who died in Switzerland in 1954.
In his writings, Ilyin consistently advocated for a unique brand of Russian fascism. First and foremost he imagined Russia as an innocent Christian “Spirit” that the West had repeatedly tried to corrupt. Russia, in other words, was always a political innocent requiring an imperial defense.
Second, he refuted the rule of law and regarded lawlessness as patriotic act: “The fact of the matter is that fascism is a redemptive excess of patriotic arbitrariness,” he wrote.
Third, he believed that only a dictator could save Russia in its constant historical struggle against evil: a redeemer with a mystical connection to his people and history. In Ilyin’s religious world view all politics becomes “the art of identifying and neutralizing the enemy.” Only a healthy Russian empire could deliver salvation against the godless agents of globalism.
Like fascists before him, Putin seeks to up end the world:
Thanks to Putin’s aggression, democracies will face higher energy prices, severe inflation, rampant political volatility and unexpected consequences throughout the global economy. War has a way of begetting more war.
By invading Ukraine, Putin is also openly signalling to neighboring democracies that he considers them weak and manageable. Sanctions cannot hurt or dissuade this dictator who has imperial ambitions wrapped in a quasi-religious crusade.
Putin has also calculated that the world will not risk nuclear war just to save a struggling democracy of 44 million people in Ukraine.
The truth is that Russia is in a very bad way:
To project strength, the autocrat must make democracies look more disorderly than Russia’s oligarchy. Because Russia can’t address its problems, it must therefore export them — everything from disinformation to lawlessness to inequality abroad. The more democracies celebrate wealthy billionaires and nationalist movements, the more they look like Russia. The more they celebrate emotion and falsehood, the more Putin wins — for the moment.
So besides feeding Putin's lust for power, the war in Ukraine creates a diversion for Russia's population. They will suffer much more before this is over.
Image: CNN
10 comments:
I just posted a comment about this TYEE article (see below) on the TYEE site
For the first time it has been embargoed: "Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by The Tyee."
My contrarian comment:
Unprovoked?
Only if you have not been paying attention.
To the Russkies, NATO expansion looks a lot like other 'recent' invasions from the west led by Napoleon and Hitler.
The CIA-sponsored orange-colour-revolution in 2014 was the dumpster fire that triggered this mess. Google "Victoria Nuland and Hunter Biden" and/or read Aaron Mate or Pepe Escobar for a different point of view.
Disclaimer: I do not support Putin or his invasion just as I didn't support the NATO war on Yugoslavia either.
Funny - the TYEE allowed this to be posted in the comments section:
While Andrew Nikiforuk's overview of Putin is correct it is only one side of the story. The situation of Ukraine and Russia has a long history, which includes the US. I suggest people get a full picture by listening to some interviews with Noam Chomski on the situation. There could have been a peaceful resolution to this mess butt he US blocked it. Here are some interesting sources:
https://truthout.org/articl...
https://www.defenddemocracy...
https://rozenbergquarterly....
It's always good to have all the facts. The US is never far from the centre of the problem.
I agree that the U.S. bears some responsibility for all this, PoV. But that does not in any way affect my take on Putin.
"It takes two to tango"
"Appearances can be deceiving"
This manufactured delve into bearbaiting
is having disaster capitalisms desired results.
How do we know?
Every leader in the world promises that no matter what
we will all have to pay big time.
Billions were made with the increase in oil
paid for by us
not going to Putin.
Manufactured
Caution Actors may be demonized by opposing media for maximum effect.
As they say, lungta, the first casualty of war is the truth.
Sorry, the idea that there was a peaceful way out of the war in Ukraine is as fantastic as Chamberlain exclaiming "peace in our time!" Like the German invasion of Poland in 1939, the Russian invasion of Ukraine was months in the planning and preparation. Huge numbers of soldiers and weapons were put in place in preparation. You only do this if your intent is to invade.
This was a pure act of aggression by Putin to remake the Soviet Union, or a least to bring its former parts under Russian control. Blaming Putin's war on the US, the EU, NATO or Ukraine - let alone Hunter Biden or Victoria Nuland -is as ridiculous as blaming Hitler's invasion of Poland on the US, Britain and France because of the terms of Treaty of Versailles. Never believe rationalizations for wars of aggression.
The invasion of Ukraine has revealed Putin in stark terms, and Owen captured it in his title at the top of the page. Those who support his actions, make excuses for him or seek to blame others are the Father Coughlins and Lord Haw-Haws of our time.
Cap
Now Putin is threatening Finland and Sweden with "military repercussions" if they bolt to NATO.
A few years ago the Swedes inventoried their fallout shelters. Population growth meant they needed more shelters, enough for another 60,000, so they built them. That's readiness in a country that sees Putin as a clear and present danger.
The Russian Black Sea fleet can easily be bottled up by Turkey. Finland and Sweden would turn the Baltic Sea into a NATO lake cutting off Russia's vital port of St. Petersburg. That leaves the Barents Sea that is regularly patrolled by US and UK subs.
I absolutely agree, Cap. The man seeks to up end the world. There is no greater threat than that.
The capacity exists to strangle all of this, Mound. What will make the difference is collective courage.
Yeah, there is no excusing Putin’s aggression here. However much NATO’s expansion may have felt threatening to Russia, most of those Eastern European countries had very good reason to feel threatened by Russia in return, and now even more so. More to the point, Ukraine posed no immediate military threat to Russia, nor was there any significant push to have them join NATO (in fact, they backed off that possibility in part to try and defuse Russian anxiety, and we can all see how well that worked out). This is just naked aggression on Putin’s part, and there is no way we should be entertaining a “both sides” narrative, let alone a, “it’s all the US’s fault for provoking them” one.
Ukraine served as a good buffer between Putin and NATO, BJ. This is all about Putin's paranoia -- and his dreams of empire.
Post a Comment