Monday, March 14, 2022

Take Him Seriously

Pierre Poilievre is a clown. Nonetheless, Susan Riley writes, it's time to take him seriously:

Random journalists, subject-matter experts, and others, try to counter Poilievre’s facetious boilerplate—“lets give Canadians back their freedom, so they can take back control of their lives!”—and a lot of people are simply turned off by his smug and snarky tone. But official Liberal sources—party apparatchiks, cabinet ministers, with three times Poilievre’s education, access to non-fake facts and a cadre of professional speechwriters? Mostly absent. Even Jean Charest, who is expected to be Poilievre’s main challenger in the current race to head the Conservative party, has barely dipped his toe into the ongoing, online leadership campaign.

Indeed, like some Liberals and media, Charest makes a huge error in adopting an air of knowing superiority towards his merciless rival. Sniffed Charest recently, asked about a Poilievre comment: “I’m not going to spend a lot of time responding to my critics … [the comment] says more about them than it says about me.”

Mr. Trudeau doesn't take Poilievre seriously:

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, too, often tries to pretend Poilievre isn’t there when he provides answers in Question Period that are totally unrelated to Poilievre’s torqued questions—and always in Trudeau’s patented robotic drone. Too many Ottawa insiders wrongly believe that Poilievre is too extreme, too cartoonish, to be taken seriously.

This has to stop. Poilievre is not simply a buffoon, although there are buffoonish aspects to his political style. He is a slippery operator, hitting upon issues of immediate concern to Canadians—rising gas and food prices, the war in Ukraine, China’s thuggishness—then blaming Justin Trudeau for all of it and more. If the obsessive focus on Trudeau may strike non-partisans as risible, the problems register as real.

Poilievre is also capable of adapting his principles—or, at least, cooling his rhetoric— according to prevailing opinion. Hence, he has dropped his original opposition to same-sex marriage, advertises himself (quietly) as pro-choice and is often nowhere to be seen when a prominent Conservative premier does, or says, something spectacularly unpopular. And, on Ukraine, for instance, Poilievre’s position is almost identical to Trudeau’s, except that he wants Russia’s ambassador kicked out of Ottawa pronto.

And Poilievre knows the value of pictures:

Poilievre’s social media feed also includes pictures of his photogenic family—wife Anaida, and two children under five, Cruz and Valentina—and even his diminutive mother, Marlene, a Conservative volunteer in a Calgary riding held by Conservative MP Stephanie Kusie. Another photo shows Poilievre, flying to the so-called “Regina Freedom Rally” of Saskatchewan supporters, reading (or pretending to read) Jody Wilson-Raybould’s Indian in the Cabinet.

These curated images are meant to soften Poilievre’s razor-sharp edges, as is his deliberately cheeky sloganeering. “Legalize smiling,” reads the caption on one video clip, in which Poilievre demands the federal government end “all mandates and restrictions” related to COVID-19. The pandemic is gone, is the underlying message, if you really want it to be.

Magical thinking from a dangerous man.

Image: SaltWire

10 comments:

Tim said...

Death by a thousand cuts appears to be PP's strategy here, from invoking a distinctly American style of politics "I'm running for Prime Minister" to his rhetoric around CoVid 19, like a beaver, he's chomping away, bit by bit, to the emotional social media soundbites everyone lives by these days. In the background it's all but assured he will win the party leadership and who knows where he will take them. He could easily win back the People's Party but what impact will he have on the centre, where the votes are that he needs to form government. Clues perhaps will be in Ontario's upcoming election- will Ontario give the stooge Ford another term? If so, PP may not be that far off come 2025. BC Waterboy

Owen Gray said...

The devolution of the Conservative Party is profoundly depressing, waterboy.

Anonymous said...

If the Libs don't seem to be taking PP seriously at this point, it may be that they would prefer to run against him as Con leader. PP's persistent blaming of Trudeau is simply a continuation of the tactics that have so far failed three Con leaders. He really brings nothing new to the table.

Cap

Ben Burd said...

Ask him where his estimated $7 or $9 million dollars in his bank came from, certainly not from his salary as an MP, he has had no other job!

Owen Gray said...

It seems to me, Cap, that the Conservatives have learned nothing from their recent experience.

Owen Gray said...

Word is that Poilievre owns considerable assets, Ben. What are the odds he inherited them?

Ben Burd said...

PP may have inherited his wealth but it has never been explained just declared on statements

Owen Gray said...

An MP's salary is pretty good, Ben. But there can't be that much money left over to invest after expenses.

Northern PoV said...

Over at the TYEE, there's an article on the comely and alliterative Leslyn Lewis.

She could give Lil'PP a run to the outhouse.

Anyone who could be leader of the CONs is just one black-face-scandal/electoral-accident away from the PMO and should be taken seriously.

Owen Gray said...

It will be interesting to see what happens, PoV.