Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Locked And Loaded


Donald Trump says his country is "locked and loaded" for a confrontation with Iran. Before he wanders into the desert again, Andrew Bacevich writes that Trump would do well to remember how the United States got entangled in Iran:

In 1987, an Iraqi warplane attacked an American Navy frigate, the Stark, on patrol in the Persian Gulf. Accepting Saddam Hussein’s explanation that the attack, which killed 37 sailors, had been an accident, American officials promptly used the episode, which came at the height of the Iran-Iraq war, to ratchet up pressure on Tehran. The incident provided the impetus for what became a brief, and all but forgotten, maritime war between the United States and Iran.
After the Stark episode, American and Iranian naval forces in the gulf began jousting, an uneven contest that culminated in April 1988 with the virtual destruction of the Iranian Navy.
Yet the United States gained little from this tidy victory. The principal beneficiary was Hussein, who wasted no time in repaying Washington by invading and annexing Kuwait soon after his war with Iran ground to a halt. Thus did America’s “friend” become America’s “enemy.”
The encounter with Iran became a precedent-setting event and a font of illusions. Since then, a series of administrations have indulged the fantasy that the direct or indirect application of military power can somehow restore stability to the gulf.
In fact, just the reverse has occurred. Instability has become chronic, with the relationship between military policy and actual American interests in the region becoming ever more difficult to discern.

Much of American foreign policy provides a study in the law of unintended consequences:

The conviction, apparently widespread in American policy circles, that in the Persian Gulf (and elsewhere) the United States is compelled to take sides, has been a source of recurring mischief. No doubt the escalating rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran poses a danger of further destabilizing the gulf. But the United States is under no obligation to underwrite the folly of one side or the other.
Supporting Iraq in its foolhardy war with Iran in the 1980s proved to be strategically shortsighted in the extreme. It yielded vastly more problems than it solved. It set in train a series of costly wars that have produced negligible benefits. Supporting Saudi Arabia today in its misbegotten war in Yemen is no less shortsighted.
Power confers choice, and the United States should exercise it. We can begin to do so by recognizing that Saudi Arabia’s folly need not be our problem.

Mr. Bacevich is no idle theoretician. Americans -- and others -- would be wise to head his warning.

Image: Modern Diplomacy

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Trump doesn't give a damn about Mr Bacevich's history lesson. Money is what motivates Trump:

"[Saudis] buy apartments from me," Trump said during a campaign rally last year, according to The Hill

"They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them? I like them very much.”

Anonymous said...

Oops, I must have forgotten to sign.

Cap

Owen Gray said...

Precisely, Cap. Trump cares about money. And he knows nothing about history -- even recent history.

the salamander said...

.. a reminder re a laughable wannabe colonial power named USA
Approx 72 countries with US military boots n hardware assets currently
The implications are obvious

Perhaps not so obvious.. China is in almost every Caribbean island country
reports a friend of mine.. to what extent or reason, I wonder

Owen Gray said...

The arms of empire have a long reach, sal.

John B. said...

This guy makes too much sense for me. Because of whatever deep state indoctrination he has undergone, he obviously can't see the world in the same way as a natural master strategist like Trump. Was Bascevich ever on TV?

John B. said...

Into any country where a Chinese national steps, the Party and the Chinese state step as well. This would generally apply to any colonizing state. When did we cease to understand this?

Owen Gray said...

Bacevich was a U.S. Army officer -- educated at West Point -- a Vietnam veteran, who got a doctorate in international relations, John. He has taught -- I think -- at Boston University. His son was killed in Iraq. He's a very bright guy, who has written several books.

Good question, John. Empires establish colonies.

the salamander said...

.. a nation that no longer thinks for itself
is a conflagration.. wildfire
That the USA elected Donald Trump
allows the Republican party & Senate to run wild
about sums it up.. insanity.. self immolation

Yet this remains a nation with nuclear subs called 'boomers'
aircraft that can launch Harpoon missiles, put men or women on the moon
dive to the Titanic, transplant hearts, but also cages refugee children
has the power to impeach and refuses to..

That is tragic dissonance.. collective failure
and Canada desperately tries to embrace & emulate them ??
You have to be kidding Mr Scheer

Owen Gray said...

The rot runs deep in The Republic. We're fools if we don't read the signs, sal.