Wednesday, September 04, 2019

The Revolution Has Arrived


There is a revolution going on in Britain. Jonathan Freedland writes:

When some of the best-known Conservative figures of the last half-century are booted out of their party, when a new prime minister loses his first parliamentary vote and his governing majority on the same day, when historians are referring to this as a “revolutionary moment”, you know something of great significance is going on. But what exactly is it?

Something similar occurred in the 17th century:

What we are witnessing is another round in the same historic struggle that powered the English civil war of the 17th century: the contest between the executive and the legislature. At its simplest, the House of Commons has voted – once again – to take control of the Brexit process, in order to prevent the UK crashing out of the European Union with no deal on 31 October. That’s the substance of the bill that MPs will vote on, and are likely to pass, today, having cleared the procedural hurdle in dramatic fashion last night. The comparisons with the 17th century are not hyperbolic, because what this move represents is a bid by the legislature – parliament – to grab powers that have traditionally been the preserve of the executive.

The opposition wants to extend the deadline for a deal to January 31. Johnson has threatened to call an election:

But that can only happen if MPs allow it, by voting for it. Under the current rules, he needs two thirds of the Commons to agree to an early election and Labour has said it won’t do it – fearing a ruse that would allow Johnson to crash out of the EU during an election campaign.
In other words, parliament is asserting itself and its rights, refusing to be pushed around by an overmighty executive (in the form of Johnson this time, rather than King Charles I). Indeed, I’m told that MPs are pondering a means to ensure their will is done over the head of the prime minister: one senior opposition figure has a bill ready that would mandate the Speaker, John Bercow, to apply to Brussels himself for that extension on behalf of the British parliament.

There is a deep irony in all of this:

It was the champions of Brexit who back in 2016 posed as the defenders of parliamentary sovereignty, determined to reassert the supremacy and independence of the Commons from the supposed encroachments of Brussels. Yet here they are now, fighting parliament at every turn: first proroguing, or suspending, parliament for five weeks; then expelling MPs from their party, even those with decades of devoted service; now seeking to defy parliament’s will. It’s quite a reverse, one captured well by that photograph of the leader of the house, Jacob Rees-Mogg, stretching out contemptuously on the Commons front bench.

All of this manoeuvring could destroy the Conservative Party -- not to mention the United Kingdom.

Image: The Commentator


8 comments:

Lorne said...

The British ructions are a fascinating topic, Owen, and I find it refreshing that Parliament is asserting itself. Too bad that in Canada, supine obeisance to the prime minister is a constant. As for the U.S., they seem to have forgotten that Congress is supposed to be a counterbalance to the presidency. Perhaps this will be a teachable moment for wayward politicians worldwide.

Owen Gray said...

Let's hope Britain -- and the Mother of all Parliaments -- reminds the world how democracy is supposed to work, Lorne.

the salamander said...

.. 'Hope' is not a valid or useful strategy Owen..
& you know that ..
Yet hope springs eternal in the human breast

Owen Gray said...

Hope doesn't gaurantee that things will work out for the best, sal. But, sometimes, that's all you have to go on.

the salamander said...

.. sometimes its 'drive' ya gots to rely on..
its a gritty thang.. a special intangible refusal to give up
a 'never say die ' a 'I have not yet begun to fight' thang..
per John Paul Jones ..

Its where I keep my unique Canadian identity
its mysterious even to me
that deep dark caring curious considering 'tude'
It does seem indelible.. won't wash off

An invisible tattoo.. received at birth or before
Abandoned at your own risk and failure ..

Welcome to 'the vision' or threat of Jason Kenney
the strange vision of Tom Flanagan and Ken Boessenkool
Where Albertans would seperate from Canada..
over Bitumen..
Would that be like Quebec separating over asbestos
or hijabs.. or tobacco or 'Distinct Society' status ?
Of course Quebec is a distinct society and culture..
Canadians revel in that.. as we we do re 'Newfies'

This is news to divisive political animals ?
? seeking a wedge ?

Rural said...

I watch with a heavy heart as the country of my birth and that of parliamentary democracy circles the drain with little chance of finding a way to plug the outlet in the foreseeable future. It seems that rational debate and compromise is already long gone both in GB and elsewhere across the world Owen.

Owen Gray said...

Unfortunately, sal, that's been the devolution of our politics. It's now all about wedges -- us and them -- not simply us and the common good.

Owen Gray said...

The cornerstone of any democracy, Rural, is rational debate. It appears that, at the beginning of the 21st century, irrationality has become the order of the day.