It's time, Susan Riley writes, to stop treating anti-vaxxers with kid gloves:
It is long past time that governments, institutions, unions, corporations, school boards—especially health-care providers, but, basically, anyone who delivers a public service—stopped cowering in the face of anti-vaxxers, stopped trying to reason with ill-informed or bad-tempered zealots, stopped extending deadlines, and watering down regulations to suit the obstinate and the ignorant.
Enough with both-sidesism, with attempts at “balance.” Science and evidence, versus harebrained social media quackery, is not a debate worth indulging. Enough, too, with the elaborate delicacy with which vaccine-resisters have been treated, the gentle encouragement from premiers and their medical officers of health to get shots (in lieu of mandatory deadlines). Alberta even offered cash bribes to induce people to do the right thing.
So much, too, for spineless politicians—Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole, who won’t even disclose the vaccination status of his MPs, springs to mind—who acknowledge they have received the shots themselves, who earnestly urge their co-citizens to do the same, but, in the next breath, are ready to give people the choice of an effective vaccine, or expensive, and uncertain, frequent testing. And what happens when anti-vaxxers set up a howl against “forced” testing?
COVID is going to be with us for a long time. Vaccinations -- annual vaccinations -- will be the new normal. And most Canadians accept that fact:
Polls repeatedly show a large majority of Canadians support vaccines. After a year-and-a-half, and millions of vaccines administered world-wide, there has been a statistically insignificant number of bad reactions. The vaccines are safe. They don’t offer 100 per cent protection against COVID, but they have been proven to radically reduce the severity of the disease and the need for hospitalization.
Instead of engaging in bogus arguments over the “violation” of the rights of vaccine-resisters—this high-handed trampling of our “freedom” to become desperately ill and to infect others—governments should be defending the parents, children, grandparents, and others, threatened by the stunning selfishness of the few.
The most infuriating anti-vaxxers -- those who work in health care -- should be given no leeway:
The most unforgivable failure, however, is various provinces’ inability, unwillingness, timidity—all of the above—to insist that staff in long-term care homes and hospitals be fully vaccinated. After so many seniors died, especially in the gruesome first months of the pandemic, it is unconscionable that, vaxxed or not, they are still at risk of outside infection.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford last week announced that hospital staff who are not vaccinated must submit to regular COVID testing. But no testing regime, or infection control measures, can match a vaccine for preventing spread. Ford blamed this cowardly, complicit approach on fear of losing too many front-line employees in a sector already under pressure. Which raises a pertinent question: do we want anti-vaxxers working in a hospital setting, or with vulnerable seniors? If they don’t believe in modern medicine, why are they in the sector in the first place?
When your paycheque depends on whether or not you've been vaccinated, even the loud and the obnoxious will get with the program.
Image: The Financial Times
18 comments:
Riley asks the right question: Is it worth retaining healthcare providers who will not do the bare minimum needed to protect the health of their clients? I say no. People deliberately putting others at risk of catching a potentially fatal or disabling disease have no business working in healthcare or in any other public-facing job, including teaching and politics. There is no constitutional right to put others at unreasonable risk, which is why we have speed limits, bans on smoking and drunk driving and so on.
Cap
We have been infected by Maggie Thatcher's brand of conservatism, Cap. "There is no such thing as society," she said. Obviously, she was a fool.
My old friend and colleague, Sue Riley, is back and not a moment too soon. She's in good company. Even Noam Chomsky says these anti-vaxxers need to be isolated from society and if they won't go voluntarily they must be shown the door.
They have no place within our civil service and absolutely none within our healthcare system.
I went to the US CDC to find out how many Americans had died from Covid vaccinations. Very, very few and those were mainly women of a certain age who had a reaction to Astrazenica. There were only 6,000 reports of any adverse effects and most of those were mild discomfort. Contrast that with probably 200,000 deaths that could have been averted by vaccinations.
https://vancouversun.com/news/world/noam-chomsky-says-the-unvaccinated-should-just-remove-themselves-from-society
The evidence is in, Mound. The vaccinations are safe. Those who claim they aren't are living on another planet.
No, Owen, they "should" be living on another planet. Maybe we could look into that.
Getting them there could be a problem, Mound.
The piece by Riley states the things that have been needed to be said for a long time, Owen. Very few issues can be viewed through an absolutist lens, but surely vaccinations are one of them. That there should even be a debate around the question of their necessity says a great deal about the loss of cohesion in modern society.
As for Ford's stated fear about the loss of healthcare workers if vaccines are mandated, substitute "his voters" and I think we get a more accurate perspective on what is going through his tiny head.
Far for me to correct you Owen, but Maggie wasn't a fool. She was a sociopath. Sorry.
mr perfect
Vaccinations have become political, Lorne. That this has happened is a measure of just how sick we have become.
One can make the case, perfect, that modern conservatism has become sociopathic.
Speaking of sociopathic Tories, Owen, today's Globe editorial explores how the Tories' version of the Republican "freedom caucus" have created an insurrection within their own ranks determined to try to force O'Toole on the HoC vaccine mandate.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-on-erin-otooles-hmcs-conservative-whos-the-captain-now/
Perhaps they'll set him adrift, Mound -- like Captain Bligh.
Who has posted accurate demographics of Healthcare Practitioners who refuse vaccination ? Like, who are they ? Nurses, docs, LTC aides, surgeons, housekeeping, specialists, janitorial, immunology.. are we arguing or conceding .. & to whom.. actually ? Is it 1 in 10 or 1 in 750 or a thousand ?
All good questions, sal. It's hard to believe that those with an advanced medical education would argue against the vaccines.
I think most of the opposition within the medical sphere comes from aides and home help non nursing employees.
Conspiracy theories give Trumps uneducated a feeling of superiority by virtue of just being contrary to general opinion and trends.
Whilst I may ruffle feathers, I would suggest that we have dumb down our expectation of accomplishment and knowledge of our youth with perhaps the yearn to learn being the biggest failure.
That said it must be difficult to teach whilst students are allowed to scroll through Facebook and spurious websites during class!
TB
Keeping the attention of young learners has always been problematic, TB. But, then, keeping the attention of the general public has always been difficult when they are given a constant diet of bread and circuses.
There are a large number of migrants from Belarus trying to enter the EU via the eastern Polish border at the moment. Let's tell them to forget the EU and come to Canada instead - if they are willing to take on work in care homes etc. Many eastern Europeans are well educated and respectful of learning and probably could adapt quickly.
I really think it is unnecessary to give in to anti-vaxxers in health care. After all, the patients have rights too.
Precisely, ffd.
Post a Comment