It used to be that evangelicals drove the Republican agenda. That, Jennifer Rubin writes, has changed:
Social policy is no longer at the heart of the agenda of the demographic. Instead, it has become nearly indistinguishable from the MAGA movement.
Conservative commentator and evangelical Christian David A. French acknowledges in a piece for the Dispatch: “We know that opposition to abortion rights motivates white Evangelicals far less than their leaders’ rhetoric would suggest. Eastern Illinois University’s Ryan Burge, one of the nation’s leading statisticians of American religion, has noted, for example, that immigration drove Evangelical support for [Donald] Trump more than abortion.”
As for gay rights, the Public Religion Research Institute’s annual values survey shows a majority of White evangelical Christians still oppose gay marriage, but that “substantial majorities in every major religious group favor nondiscrimination laws that protect LGBTQ people, ranging from 59% among white evangelical Protestants to 92% among religiously unaffiliated Americans.” Moreover, even opposition to gay marriage is declining because of a massive generational divide on the issue between older evangelicals and more tolerant millennials and Generation Xers.
So what do evangelicals want?
PRRI’s chief executive Robert P. Jones points out: “Among the 42% of Virginia voters who believe that Confederate monuments should be taken down, nearly nine in ten (87%) voted for the Democratic candidate Terry McAuliffe.” By contrast, “Among the 51% of Virginia voters who believe that Confederate monuments should be left in place, more than eight in ten (82%) voted for Republican candidate Glenn Youngkin.”
Other statistics bolster the view that racism or defense of white supremacy is at the heart of the GOP. Jones writes:
Among voters who hold an unfavorable view of the Black Lives Matter movement, believe the U.S. criminal justice system treats all people fairly, or believe that racism is a minor problem or not a problem at all, more than eight in ten voted for Donald Trump. At the national level, the divides produced by these attitudes are stronger than the divides over abortion. Among those who believe abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, 76% voted for Trump.
The fixation with defining the United States as a White Christian nation is on full display nightly on Fox News, where replacement theory — not abortion or gay rights — drives so much more of the conversation.
In this context, White evangelical Christians’ attraction to the thrice-married philanderer Trump is understandable, as is their support for the cruelest immigration policies (e.g., child separation) and the anti-Muslim travel ban. It’s all about race and religious identity, not policies founded in Christian values and certainly not about finding a role model for civic virtues. Trump was determined to protect White evangelicals against people of color and the decline in Christian identification; that was all they could hope for in a politician.
Republicans have a simple agenda -- get rid of people of colour. Don't let them cross the border and don't let them attain positions of power. They are the party of White Supremacy.
That's it.
Image: ADL
8 comments:
White evangelicals have always been closely tied to slavery and racism. The Southern Baptist Conference, the biggest evangelical group, supported slavery and continued discrimination against Blacks following Reconstruction.
They supported their position with biblical passages. To claim these are "not policies founded in Christian values" is historically inaccurate. For centuries, evangelicals have used the Bible to support white supremacy and this translates directly into their current support for Republicans and their past support for the Democratics. Trump is only the latest white supremacist to have benefitted.
Cap
That Nazi flag was a shock.[1]
I really don't pay that much attention to US internal politics but I've been absolutely horrified to see the amount of racism in the last few years. During the 80s and 90s I had actually thought things were getting better down there.
I realize we have serious racism here too but it doesn't seem to be anywhere near as horrible as is what's happening down there though that attack in London scares me. Quebec was worse but seemed like a one-off.
1. And I speak as someone who has been in Swastika ON.
Hitler also claimed he spoke for "The Master Race," jrk.
Southern Baptists supported segregation -- claiming that Genesis made it clear that Cain and his descendants were sent into the land of Nod, Cap. Nod was Africa and God placed "the mark of Cain" on Cain and his children.
That mark was their black skin -- which had been ordained by God.
Don't forget the Mormons, who have even more explicit religious texts telling them coloured skin marks someone as lesser. They provide a safe repub state all on their own.
Many religions aren't particularly tolerant, aweb.
As long as so many rely on the Old Testament and ignore Jesus's New Testament's message of love, Owen, ugly and unchristian bigotry and hatred will prevail.
The God of the Old Testament was an angry God, Lorne. According to the New Testament, the Son of God was crucified. Who wants to be crucified?
Post a Comment