Wednesday, December 21, 2022

The Petulant Oligarch

Elon Musk's meltdown reminds us -- yet again -- that we live in the Age of the Petulant Oligarch. Paul Krugman writes:

As The Times’s Kevin Roose recently pointed out, Musk still has many admirers in the technology world. They see him not as a whiny brat but as someone who understands how the world should be run — an ideology the writer John Ganz calls bossism, a belief that the big people shouldn’t have to answer to, or even face criticism from, the little people. And adherents of that ideology clearly have a lot of power, even if that power doesn’t yet extend to protecting the likes of Musk from getting booed in public.

How did we get here?

It’s not really a surprise that technological progress and rising gross domestic product haven’t created a happy, equitable society; downbeat visions of the future have been staples of both serious analysis and popular culture for as long as I can remember. But both social critics like John Kenneth Galbraith and speculative writers like William Gibson generally imagined corporatist dystopias that suppressed individuality — not societies dominated by thin-skinned egomaniac plutocrats acting out their insecurities in public view.

Part of the answer, surely, is the sheer scale of wealth concentration at the top. Even before the Twitter fiasco, many people were comparing Elon Musk to Howard Hughes in his declining years. But Hughes’s wealth, even measured in today’s dollars, was trivial compared with Musk’s, even after the recent plunge in Tesla stock. More generally, the best available estimates say that the top 0.00001 percent’s share of total wealth today is almost 10 times what it was four decades ago. And the immense wealth of the modern super-elite has surely brought a lot of power, including the power to act childishly.

Beyond that, many of the superrich, who as a class used to be mostly secretive, have become celebrities instead. The archetype of the innovator who gets rich while changing the world isn’t new; it goes back at least as far as Thomas Edison. But the big fortunes made in information technology turned this narrative into a full-blown cult, with wannabe or seem-to-be Steve Jobs types everywhere you look.

Indeed, the cult of the genius entrepreneur has played a large role in the rolling debacle that is crypto. Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX wasn’t selling a real product nor, as far as anyone can tell, are those of his former competitors who haven’t yet gone bankrupt: After all this time, nobody has come up with significant real-world uses for cryptocurrency other than money-laundering. What Bankman-Fried was selling, instead, was an image, that of the mussy-haired, scruffily dressed visionary who grasps the future in a way normies can’t.

Elon Musk isn’t in quite the same category. His companies produce cars that actually drive and rockets that actually fly. But the sales and especially the market value of his companies surely depend at least in part on the strength of his personal brand, which he can’t seem to help himself from trashing ever more with each passing day.

Put bluntly, it comes down to this: the concentration of wealth encourages corruption.

Image: Vanity Fair

8 comments:

Gordie said...

I fail to understand why people hero-worship Musk.

What kind of owner (the head twit?) let's a Twitter poll decide who runs a company?

I heard him say that the world's biggest problem is that there aren't enough people on the planet. In fact, the biggest problem is that there are too many people.

Musk wants his employees to work 24/7 but he just recently jetted to Qatar to watch the world Cup. I'd tell my boss what to do with his job if I worked for Twitter.

I'd like to see people stop using twitter and watch Musk lose his 45 billion. Now that would be funny, except for the collateral damage of people losing their jobs.

Ahhhh, you got me going now. Let's see, where did I put my meds?

Owen Gray said...

My impression, Gordie, is that the guy who apparently was once the world's richest man is full of himself.

zoombats said...

He's full of a lot more than hisself Owen

Owen Gray said...

There is a common word for fraud, zoombats. A simple four-letter word.

Rob said...

I looked up: musk
/mask/
noun: musk; plural noun: musks; noun: musk plant; plural noun: musk plants

1. a strong-smelling reddish-brown substance (which is secreted by the male musk deer for scent-marking and is an important ingredient in perfumery).

I believe the first part of the definition, not in brackets, is what I think of every time I see his name. I like the perfumery part also! He has taken over the media just like Trump.

Owen Gray said...

And, as is the case with Trump, Rob, the source of the smell is corruption.

Northern PoV said...

Petulant indeed.

What an wonderful and under-used adjective.

Could well be applied to many groups in our modern world, including most of the right wing, especially Lil'PP and his ilk here in Canada.

Owen Gray said...

Petulant Pierre Poilievre. It has a nice alliterative ring to it, PoV.