Liz Truss has only been Prime Minister of Britain for a short time. But she's already headed for the exit. Owen Jones writes:
No one can deny that Liz Truss was a dire front person for her own economic policies, offering a demeanour that had all the reassurance of a random stranger plucked off the street to become your local school’s headteacher. Having turned her own citizens into lab rats for an experiment brewed in the boardrooms of opaquely funded rightwing thinktanks, she has now been barred from the lab itself. Buried by the very “markets” she once fetishised, the prime minister is terminally wounded, fronting policies that, just days ago, she would have savaged as coming from the “anti-growth coalition”. Demanding the removal of Truss is something of an abstract question because, in any meaningful sense, she is no longer in power.
But no one should lay the blame for her demise solely at her feet:
We must not let the Conservative party blame this all on Truss, anoint her successor, and then regroup and reset, as if everything is back to normal.
The rehabilitation of monsters – or, at least, the lack of accountability for villains – is one of the reasons our country is in its present disarray. The Tory knack for reinvention depends on it, which is why they’ve so far survived overseeing what is, by many measures, the most ruinous time in office of any government in living memory. Let’s not forget what happened to Theresa May, who – after carelessly disposing of the Tories’ parliamentary majority – was condemned to remain in office by her own party, in the hope she’d absorb the political mortar fire otherwise directed at the Conservatives as a whole. When that purpose had been served, May could be safely discarded, with Boris Johnson heralded as the leader of a fresh new government that was innocent of the sins of his predecessor.
You can also see it as George Osborne is interviewed on Channel 4’s flagship political programme in the capacity of witness, rather than an accused in the dock. No single politician is more guilty for the burning skip that British society has become: his ideologically charged austerity is at the root of the longest squeeze in wages of modern times, fuelling the discontent that proved pivotal in the triumph of leave in the 2016 referendum. He tuts now at economic policies recklessly defying market rules, as though it wasn’t under his economic stewardship that Britain’s AAA-rated debt status wasn’t stripped away.
But more consequentially, observe our new de facto prime minister, Jeremy Hunt. One political commentator declared that “listening to Hunt in interviews this morning [was] like reaching calm blue sea after weeks in a force 10 storm”. It is difficult not to conclude that for many self-described moderates, politics is all about vibe, not about substance: a politician’s record matters less than the reassurance offered by their presentation skills. Hunt himself conceded that, as health secretary, he was too slow to boost the NHS workforce: a euphemistic revision of how he ignored severe NHS staff shortages, which left us underprepared for the pandemic. Given he agitated for corporation tax to be slashed to an even lower level than Truss had dreamed of, how can he credibly argue he will offer a meaningful alternative to Trussonomics? His new “economic advisory council” is comprised of fund managers and bankers – two of the few groups in society who can claim to have profited from the last dismal few years.
In Britain and around the world, conservatives are ill-equipped to handle the problems we face. That's because they live in a world that no longer exists.
Image: CNN
11 comments:
We last visited England in 2018, Owen, and it was clear by then that the sun had set on the former empire. People sleeping in the streets was only the most obvious sign of their decline.
Britain's Conservatives want to make the United Kingdom "great again." That phrase has become ignominious, Lorne.
"make the United Kingdom "great again.""
MUKGA ??
I wouldn't be surprised to see that acronym, PoV.
"make the United Kingdom "great again.""
MUKGA ??
Under Boris that would be hilarious, not so much with Truss.
The UK is in the unfortunate position of choosing between the devil they have or the devil they had; for Starmer is nothing but a Blairite !
TB
The disease runs deep, TB.
"Operation Lone Star" In Texas Seizes Enough Fentanyl To Kill Every American
"342 million lethal doses"
Luckily that southern border is under the control of the Kamala.
That's part of the new world -- around the world -- Nick. Climate change, political instability and war are creating millions of refugees. But is the solution to building a wall? The Germans simply flew over the Maginot Line.
Documents show that the Canadian federal government received regular updates indicating the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa were non-violent in nature, despite the Trudeau administration’s claims otherwise.
According to Blacklock’s Reporter, Internal Department of Public Safety reports show that on the same day Prime Minister Justin Trudeau enacted the Emergencies Act (EA) to clear out the protesters, a report stated the protests were peaceful.
“No concerns at this time,” noted a February 14 report from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
Trudeau on the same day, however, claimed to reporters that the protests were “illegal and dangerous,” saying they could not be allowed “to continue.”
Multiple daily reports from the Department of Public Safety leading up to Trudeau enacting the EA show that there were no major concerns that the Freedom Convoy protests were violent.
A January 27 report said, “The Freedom Convoy so far has been peaceful and cooperative with police.”
Blacklock’s Reporter listed five such statements asserting there were no issues.
A January 29 report stated there were “No major incidents,” while a report from February 1 said, “no violence took place.”
A February 6 report concluded that disruption to “government activities is so far minor.”
A report from February 10 said that there was a “minimal” amount of people on Parliament Hill, while an update from the next day stated the “situation remains stable and planning is ongoing.”
Canada’s Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino also claimed the Freedom Convoy might be violent in nature, despite the internal reports stating otherwise.
Government staff even wrote that the “majority of the events have been peaceful,” noting that as most people were working from home, there was very little disruption to “government activities.”
Canada’s Department of Foreign Affairs in a memo said that it had “not observed any significant indicators of foreign state involvement related to the truckers’ convoy.”
Canada’s draconian COVID measures were the catalyst for the Freedom Convoy, which took to the streets of Ottawa to demand an end to all mandates for three weeks in February.
The EA gave the Trudeau government unprecedented powers such as the ability to freeze bank accounts without a court order and deploy police at will.
While Trudeau revoked the EA on February 23, many who supported the Freedom Convoy were targeted by the federal government and had their bank accounts frozen without a court order.
Remember, Carley, that there was plenty of evidence on the ground that the protest was highly disruptive. And there were the blockades at the border. The EA was not implemented as a knee-jerk reaction.
The protest went on for two weeks before the act was brought in.
Carley Strang
You sound reasonable but you are just a polite troll...
"Canada’s draconian COVID measures " you must be kidding.
"The EA gave the Trudeau government unprecedented powers " you ain't seen nothing yet
Hey - I am all for insurrections - 1776 down south or France in 1789 for example.
But insurrectionists have to have massive popular support to overcome the forces of the State. Don't shut down two border crossings (with weapons ready to go) and arrive in the nation's capitol with an agenda for to force the gov't out and expect the State sit back and enjoy the hot tub/barbeque pageants that obscure your violent nature.
Read John Berger on protest:
https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/isj/1968/no034/berger.htm
Post a Comment