Susan Delacourt writes that the Freedom Convoy was a big deal:
Witnesses at the public inquiry into last winter’s convoy protest in Canada may already be running out of ways to describe how massive, weird and yes, frightening it was.
“Unprecedented” is a word that’s been thrown around a lot in the first week of hearings. “Nothing of this magnitude has ever been seen, quite frankly, in any city that I’m aware of in Canada in the last 25 years,” Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson testified.
Former Ottawa police chief Peter Sloly, according to one of his deputies, called it a “hydra” — a creature with many heads that needed to be “cut off and cauterized.”
Acting Deputy Police Chief Patricia Ferguson, who said she had to look up what the word meant when Sloly created “Mission Hydra,” definitely agreed Ottawa was dealing with some kind of strange new beast last January when the so-called “Freedom Convoy” rolled into the capital.
“This was obviously unprecedented in terms of its size and the type of thing we were dealing with,” Ferguson said during her testimony last week.
Until we know what this multi-headed creature was, no one will know how to make sure it doesn’t return — or, more importantly, whether it remains an ongoing concern for peace, order and good government in this country.
So what have we learned about the convoy?
First of all, most obviously perhaps, this thing was clearly more than a protest. Police stopped calling it that, we learned, when the “protesters” failed to pack up and leave town after the first weekend — when the hot tubs, stages and jerry cans of gasoline started arriving. That fact was established in the testimony of acting deputy chief Ferguson and some of the documents explored when she took the stand.
Police were pretty unanimous that Ottawa was dealing with a full-fledged occupation within days of the convoy’s arrival.
We also know it was national in scope and on the radar screen of police intelligence at least a couple of weeks before Ottawa was occupied.
There have been lots of moments of high-level intrigue during the past week, but it was Ontario Provincial Police Supt. Patrick Morris who provided the content most likely to be turned into a spy novel.
Since about 2019 or so, Morris testified, police, security and intelligence agencies at all levels across Canada have been keeping their eyes on a “significant amount of protest, dissent, some of which caused us reasonable grounds to suspect or believe that those issues would engage in criminal activity or illegal activity that would have a public safety impact.”
What they’re monitoring are brush fires of dissent that can explode into larger conflagrations, such as the rail blockades of early 2020 that started as an Indigenous land protest in B.C. No doubt Hendon was also keeping an eye on the 2021 election protests that dogged Justin Trudeau, which seemed to be a sneak preview of the convoy.
All of their intelligence is amassed, Morris said, in something called a “Hendon Strategic Intelligence Report,” which is distributed widely across the country to police and other security agencies. (Whenever the spy movie is made, it might be called the Hendon Report.)
The Hendon reports, he went on, were honing in on loose, vague protests such as “Shut Down Canada” and something police called the “Patriot Movement.” They were also picking up on increases in hate crimes and illegal activity associated with dissent.
COVID fatigue definitely played a role as these protest flames were fanned into the convoy fire, Morris said. “This is not one monolithic entity. These are grassroots, what I refer to as affinity groups, that share grievances. They acted locally, and also tried to coalesce, and I would say that this was the first successful coalescence.”
The convoy, as we are learning through week one of the hearings, was frustratingly difficult to contain because it had no one leader, no one cause and no clear demands. Demands they did have, Morris said, were already recognized to be impossible to meet (end COVID mandates now, etc.).
Money is a huge issue, simply because there was lots of it being raised online. The Star reported earlier this week that foreign money was not a major factor in the protest, according to intelligence documents deposited with the commission. But we also know the convoy was getting big shout-outs on Fox News in the U.S. and Ontario Premier Doug Ford said earlier this week that U.S. governors were highly attuned to the convoy protest.
And there was American influence behind the occupation:
At least a couple of witnesses have testified, too, that what was going on in Ottawa felt a little too similar to what happened on Capitol Hill on Jan. 6, 2021. The commission, one presumes, is going to probe those connections more deeply, whether they are figurative (inspiration for some) or literal (actual ties to the insurrectionists in the U.S.).
I suspect that what the inquiry uncovers will make us very uncomfortable.
Image: The BBC
10 comments:
"what the inquiry uncovers will make us very uncomfortable." We wish ...
Winston Smith is very busy atm:
"FUREY: The Emergencies Act inquiry isn't looking good for Trudeau"
"Emergencies Act wasn’t needed to deal with ‘Freedom Convoy’ protests, OPP says as public inquiry begins"
"NDP unlikely to pull support for Liberals if commission concludes use of Emergencies Act was unjustified: Singh"
"LILLEY: Watson wanted to protect Trudeau, embarrass Ford during convoy"
Right now, there's all kinds of speculation, PoV. When the inquiry is finished the facts may surprise a lot of people.
The convoy should never be referred to with freedom in the sentence again. It is a misuse of the word freedom and also an insult to the definition of "seditious insurrection".
"Deluded clownvoy" would also be accepted as a correct answer.
I am all for proper descriptive use of the English language.
How any police analyse of the potential problem missed the fact that at least 14,000,000 pounds of steel were coming with about 80,000 - 120,000 galleons of fuel and with totally undocumented cargo and how when asked to move by foot patrols refused after weeks the emergencies act wasn't necessary?
Imagine all those rigs pulled along side of all those building and set ablaze.
Diagolons' (the Coutts boys and pawlivers frenemy) mission statement is burn it down. Our process and politeness may be our downfall.
ref.
Diagolon can be categorized as an “accelerationist” group, according to researchers who study extremism.
Director of the Centre for Bias, Hate and Extremism at Ontario Tech University Barbara Perry defined accelerationism as the “intent on accelerating or fomenting a civil war, overturning what they see as the current corrupt, illegitimate order.”
I agree, lungta. The convoy wasn't about fredom. It was about insurrection.
“Nothing of this magnitude has ever been seen, quite frankly, in any city that I’m aware of in Canada in the last 25 years,” Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson testified.
So any idea what happened in Canada 25 years ago then?
210 years gets you something, Mayor Jim .
In terms of magnitude, lungta, the only comparable incident I can think of is the Winnipeg General strike of 1919.
I am really, truly hoping that the majority of those who initiated and supported the Convoy are labeled as terrorists, especially the angry Wexiteers. - LY
One of those testifying at the enquiry said the "protest" could have been dealt with, without using the Emergency Act. Well if they could have, why didn't they and exactly what were they going to do to resolve it. My quess? Nothing. They didn't have much of a plan and the plan they had wouldn't work because the tow truck operators werenn't going to co-operate.
These terrorists who took over Ottawa streets did not care about the residents in the city. They didn't care that various levels of government wanted them to go, they wanted our elected government to leave office and that they replace them and "rule" along with the Govenor General. Those terrorists had no idea how that wasn't possible. They didn't understand Canadian demcracy nor the rights of other citizens.
Once the Emergency Act was declared it felt a lot better. Tow truck operators had to start doing a job of removing the rigs and the owners got the message and started to leave. There was also notice given by the government what would happen if people did not leave. The truckers paid attention.
The enquiry is O.K. because perhaps we ought to look at things such as an Emergency Act being invoked, however Trudeau and the federal Liberals were duly elected to govern the country. Declaring the Emergency act in this case was part of governing.
Given the actions of the truckers in Ottawa led me to conclude they were ill informed about the country's laws, were making demands which were not consitent with the Constition, and having watched the 6 Jan. insurrection in the U.S.A. my concern was not only that one of those trucks could turn into a bomb, but some one might get up on one of those trucks and start shooting with an automatic rifle.
Invoking the Emergency Act sent a clear message to these teorrists and any in the future, the government will act. It has the law and will use it, well at least if your last name is Trudeau. I'm good with the invoking of the Act given the circastances.
These terrorist truckers were "upset" because the government wanted people to be vaccinated and if people weren't vaccinated, they wanted them out a lot of places. That is what governments do when there are new diseases over which the medical profession has no control. No one was forcing anyone to get vaccinated or wear masks, etc they just couldn't go a whole lot of places. 46218 people have died of covid in Canada and over 4 million had covid. Had the government not taken action a lot more would have died.
It's pretty clear that they wanted to blow things up, LY. They need to be recognized for who they are.
There are a lot of us who don't understand how our government work, e.a.f. A lot of these people were in the convoy.
Post a Comment